A friend of mine entered a contest recently where there was cheating but luckily the company hired to run the online contest had some of of knowing and disqualified the cheaters.

Good luck to you, it really is a shame people don’t have better values.

Thanks a bunch!

When this happens, the judges might question whether a prospective Class Act Canada champion could be cheating. However, it would seem rather late in the game to be concerned about contestant integrity, so I think you should just give them the benefit of the doubt…as you already you have throughout Phases two and three of the contest. On the bright side for Sprott Shaw, you now have some excellent intelligence concerning potential gaps and redundancies in your current curricula at Sprott Shaw. Based on the manifest skill sets of the contest “winners”, you can certainly reduce significantly the amount of time devoted to computing studies. The time freed up might logically be devoted to selected topics in Applied Ethics. These courses typically entail “the philosophical examination, from a moral standpoint, of particular issues in private and public life that are matters of moral judgment.” The first assignment could focus on contrasting deontological (“the ends do not justify the means”) and teleological (“the ends justify the means”) theories with respect to winning admission to Sprott Shaw College. The challenge may be to find someone at Sprott Shaw with the audacity to teach such a course.